Budget

…now browsing by tag

 
 

Gov Brown Vetoes “Unrealistic” Budget

Friday, June 17th, 2011

Governor Jerry Brown called the budget plan agreed upon by California lawmakers “unrealistic” and voted the bill on Thursday afternoon. What’s even more aggressive, though, is that he did it on YouTube, publicly demanding the legislators choose between deep spending cuts or significant tax hikes. Finance types hailed second-time democratic governor’s aggressive approach to the issue.

“Today I have vetoed the California state budget,” Brown said in a short YouTube video. “I do so reluctantly but with clear purpose. For a decade the can has been kicked down the road and debt has piled up.”


GOP Lawmakers Baffled over Strickland’s “Taxpayers Caucus”

Thursday, March 17th, 2011

There’s been a lot of speculation around the Capitol over exactly what motivated the 30 Republican lawmakers to form a new “taxpayers caucus” last month led by state Senator Tony Strickland (R – Moorpark).  The group is dedicated to fighting Gov. Jerry Brown’s plan to put taxes on a June ballot unless there’s an accompanying ballot measure that would let voters choose to lower taxes by the same amount.

Every one of those legislators had already signed the Grover Norquist “taxpayer protection pledge” where they promised to “oppose and vote against any and all efforts to increase taxes.” So why did they need another, new pledge?

This move on the part of Strickland, coupled with close ties to Meg Whitman (who was soundly rejected by Californians) and his loss in last year’s state Controller’s race, are beginning to lose him support with local & influential Republicans.

Read more in the San Francisco Chronicle –

Schwarzenegger Sued Over Line-Item Vetoes

Monday, August 10th, 2009

Today, attorneys for Senate President pro Tem Darrell Steinberg filed this complaint on the Pro Tem’s behalf against Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger in San Francisco Superior Court.  The first line of the complaint says it all: “This case is about separation of powers.”

The filing outlines how exactly the Governor overstepped his constitutional authority in making almost $500 million line-item vetoes to mostly human services programs. As the Pro Tem said Friday, Californians elected a Governor, not an emperor. The filing explains that the Governor can only use line item veto authority to cut “appropriations,” and not the revised reductions in existing, previously enacted appropriations in the Legislature’s July 24 budget bill.

The filing asks the court “to order the Controller to disregard the Governor’s purported vetoes of the budget items described more fully below and to declare that the Governor’s purported vetoes are null and void.”

– excerted from Calitics, August 10, 2009

Increase the Tobacco Tax: A No-Brainer

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009

In California, smoking related costs total more than $15 billion each year. Nationwide, smoking-caused health care costs total $10.28 per pack sold in the U.S.  Shouldn’t smokers pay for the resulting cost to society?

Cigarette taxes could not only ease the enormous economic burden to existing public health programs that treat tobacco related illnesses, but with the current budget deficit, Governor Swarzenegger has announced a series of cuts that would hit children and families hardest – perhaps leaving California alone as the only state without a safety net for women and children.

For every $1 added to the tobacco tax, we could raise $1 billion in revenue. This increase could be enough to keep healthy families afloat and offset a large amount of cuts to education.  Since California’s tobacco tax has not increased in more than a decade, and 75 percent of Californians support higher tobacco taxes, now is the time to increase the cost of cigarettes to protect our kids, their education, and their health.

Excerpted, in part, from a June 23 Calitics article by Tom Torlakson

Message from CDP Chairman John Burton About Budget Choices

Monday, June 15th, 2009

Dear Democrat,

In the coming weeks, our state legislators will face stark choices about our state budget – choices that will touch the lives of nearly all Californians.

If our legislators do as Governor Schwarzenegger asks, California will slash billions from public schools and community colleges, eliminate health care for nearly two million people (half of them children), end the grants that allow high-achieving middle-class and poor students to attend college and close more than 200 of our state parks. AIDS patients will be denied medicine. Domestic violence shelters will lose funding.

What the governor’s budget doesn’t do is ask big corporations, oil and tobacco companies or the very wealthy to share in the sacrifice. That’s just wrong. As our lawmakers make critical budget decisions to fill the shortfall, we must tell them what’s important to California’s residents and the future of our state.

The current budget year ends June 30, so we may only have a week or two to make a difference. Please take a minute right now to send a message to your legislators about the budget – before it’s too late. Tell them that we must have a budget that includes new revenue to pay for the services we all need.

As Democrats, we stand firmly against the severity of the proposed cuts. We will do everything possible to minimize the cuts and the harm they will inflict. That’s why we’re urging legislators to Protect All Californians by passing a balanced, sensible budget that includes new revenue.

Our budget ought to reflect our values – but right now, it doesn’t. California has tremendous oil reserves, yet the governor isn’t asking oil companies to pay the same extraction fees imposed in other states. Corporations reap billions from tax loopholes that are left intact. And the wealthiest Californians aren’t asked to pitch in more – in fact, the most affluent Californians currently pay a lower income tax rate than they did when Republican Pete Wilson was governor.

Adding revenue from any of those sources would help minimize some of the devastating cuts looming for education and social services. Yet Republicans so far would rather protect a few elite special interests instead of millions of average Californians. We must help them see the error of their ways! And Democratic lawmakers need our support and thanks as they strive to minimize the harm inflicted in this brutal budget year.

The only way to ensure our elected representatives make the right choices is to speak up now and to keep speaking out until the budget has been passed.

Please take a moment to send a letter to your legislators asking them to pass a budget that will Protect All Californians, not just the privileged few. We will continue to give you ways to stay involved in the budget battle in the days and weeks to come.

Please join me in standing up for our Democratic values and fighting to Protect All Californians.

Peace and friendship,
John

P.S. The budget fight is upon us and the cuts proposed by the governor would devastate millions of poor and middle-class Californians – and affect us all. If you believe as I do that California must find a balanced budget solution that includes new revenues, please take a minute to send that message to your legislators today. Go to www.cadem.org/ltl-budget.

A Purple and Gold Revolution?

Monday, June 15th, 2009

For all the complaints about the extreme difficulty in getting Californians to pay attention to budget battles, and all the money spent on attempting to convince a generally apathetic voting public that the crisis is real, very little seems to break through. Many legislators seem resigned to the idea that huge, painful cuts may be necessary to shock voters out of their complacency.

With any luck, though, a not-so-painful but very prominent cut may be able to get a bunch of usually apolitical types out of their armchairs, because it appears that the city of L.A. won’t be able to afford a parade for the victorious Los Angeles Lakers. From a Reuters article written prior to tonight’s game:

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) – The Los Angeles Lakers need only one more win to capture a 15th National Basketball Association Championship, but some city officials are already saying they can’t afford to throw the team a victory party.

The Lakers have taken a 3-1 lead in their best-of-seven series against the Orlando Magic and will clinch the championship if they win again on Sunday night, setting the stage for a triumphal parade through downtown Los Angeles as early as Tuesday.

But such a celebration could cost the city $1 million or more at a time when city leaders, faced with a deep budget deficit, were contemplating worker layoffs and cuts in services.

“We can’t afford to cover the costs,” City Councilwoman Jan Perry told the Los Angeles Times. “How could we make a decision about people’s jobs and then sponsor the parade?”

Barbara Maynard, a spokeswoman for the city’s employee unions, agreed, telling the paper: “We do not believe its appropriate in this economic climate for taxpayers to be funding a parade.”

But Councilman Bernard Parks said he expected the city to throw the parade and pick up the tab.

“There’s going to be a major celebration in the city and the likelihood is the city is going to absorb the bulk of those costs,” he said. “The city isn’t going to have time over the next few hours to negotiate a contract with the Lakers or anyone else.”

So even as Calitics.com’s own David Dayen will be attempting to navigate downtown Pittsburgh in the middle of a Penguins parade tomorrow, visitors to Los Angeles needn’t worry, because the Lakers may not even be having a parade. B-baller and supposed Lakers fan Tony Strickland doubtless won’t care, as there’s no cigarette or oil money involved. Big surprise.

The important question, though, is whether Angelenos will show some Iranian-style civil disobedience over government failures costing them the ability to even hold a parade for their hometown heroes, or whether this too will pass silently into the morass of collective apathy with barely a shrug.

Help Repeal 2/3 Rules in California

Thursday, May 21st, 2009

The following is from the Professor of Cognitive Science and Linguistics at the University of California, Berkeley, George Lakoff. He is also a very good political strategist who understands framing and its importance in political debate.

“The Democratic leadership should listen to its grassroots.They should immediately stop negotiating with the governor and other Republicans on how to destroy even more of what makes our state human. The Democrats, as a whole body, not just the leadership, should assert their majority, decide for themselves how they want to deal with the shortfall, and then invite the defeated Republicans publicly to join them and take their proposals to the public, first organizing serious grassroots support. “

We must immediately reject the frame that the Governor and the Republicans are trying to put on this special election. They are trying to claim that the voters have spoken and that they/we want cuts and only cuts. Already some moderate and weak Democrats in the legislature are beginning to parrot this idiocy. It is important that we reach out to our Democratic Assembly members and Senators and let them know that we want them to fight, not just cut cut cut. I could go into my justifications for this position, but I think I will rely on some people that know much more about polling and what actually happened in this election instead. From a polling memo by David Binder Research, here are the facts on this recent special election:

Contrary to what the Governor is saying after the defeat of his proposals, Prop 1A did not fail because voters delivered a message to “go all out” in cutting government spending. The all-time record low turnout for a statewide special election clearly demonstrates the lack of depth to that argument. Prop 1A did not generate a spike in turnout and taxes were not cited as the main reason why voters overwhelmingly rejected Prop 1A. Support for a state budget that relies solely on spending cuts is very limited – even among those voting no on Prop 1a.

Voters in this election were more likely to be Republicans and less likely to be Independents, whereas Democratic voters came out in proportions consistent with past turnout. Of those that voted in this election, 43% were Democrats, 42% were Republicans and 15% were Independents or minor party voters. This past November, the electorate consisted of 46% Democrats, 32% Republicans and 22% Independents or minor party voters.

In November 2010, the electorate will be a group that is more supportive of the revenue options tested in the survey, and more strongly opposed to only using cuts to balance the state budget. While only 36% of voters that turned out for the May 19th election supported using entirely budget cuts to balance the budget, even fewer – only 24% — of non-voters felt the same way.

As I’ve been writing recently the real culprits in this situation are the 2/3 rules that give inordinate, undemocratic power to the minority party. We need to stand up and point the finger at the Republicans and dare them to destroy the largest economy in the entire United States. If they choose this incredibly irresponsible option, we need to hold them accountable by any legal means necessary. These may include recall proceedings on reckless, recalcitrant Republican Senators who obstruct and refuse to compromise on their already demonstrably failed ideology. Further, we need to target the 2/3 rules and eliminate their undemocratic influences. It is irrational to cling to the same failed, anti-tax, free-market ideology of the likes Grover Norquist. Our own State Senator, Tony Strickland, won his Senate seat by the thinnest of margins, yet he ignored at least 50% of his constituency and stood against passing a reasonable budget. Now that the special election has failed it is time to get to work on repealing the 2/3 rules and returning Democracy to California. More from George Lakoff:

The Democratic leadership should immediately take the initiative on a 2010 ballot measure, a supremely simple one-sentence measure. It would go something like this:All budgetary and revenue issues shall be decided by a majority vote in both houses of the legislature.

One sentence. Simple. Straightforward. Understandable. And democratic. It should be called the California Democracy Act. From grade school on, we associate democracy with majority rule. It will make sense to voters – at last!

The term “revenue” would cover taxes without waving a red flag.

Up to now, Democrats have been acting like sheep being herded by the Republican minority. They need to show courage and stand up for what they believe. That’s what the voters are waiting for… The voters have spoken. You Democratic office-holders have(sic) chance to come out on the side of the voters. Take it!

Now, this is likely to be an ugly fight and we need to be prepared for the long haul. In addition to the repeal of the 2/3 rules, we have another good idea lying around that we should pursue. The Constitutional Convention. I’ve been researching this possibility whereby delegates would get together and either revise or change entirely the state’s Constitution. Just this morning I was converted to be supporter of a Constitutional Convention. My initial fears centered around just who exactly these delegates would be. I was, and am still concerned about the process by which decisions would be made on any new Constitution, but many of my fears were allayed by a person with far more understanding of the process than I. Blogger and Public Policy Director for the Courage Campaign, Robert Cruickshank addressed my fears on Calitics:

1. There are two possible routes to a convention. The first is the existing route – 2/3 of the Legislature votes to call one. Under Article 18 of the Constitution delegates would then be elected by Assembly district. There is some gray area here – how many delegates per district? Would the convention’s scope be limited to exclude social issues? (One method is to say the convention cannot propose to voters anything amending Article 1). It’s unclear whether a 2/3 majority can be obtained for a convention in this Legislature. The obstacle would not necessarily be the GOP, but instead might be established interests who fear what a convention might do.The second route is through two initiatives. “Prop A” would change the Constitution to allow voters to call a convention without the Legislature. “Prop B” would then actually call the convention pursuant to the approval of Prop A. Prop B is where the key details would be – how are delegates picked? What would the scope be?

2. The key debate over the details will indeed be how delegates are picked. Some want a “jury” style method, such as the British Columbia Citizens Assembly used (where a random sample gets sent a request to serve, those who want to serve send it back, and that gets whittled down to a certain number through various processes). Others want a election process. That could be big and progressive – say, 15 per assembly district, elected under public financing rules. There are Voting Rights Act and maybe even Prop 209 considerations to this, although one could write the initiative to specifically exempt it from Prop 209. We could also exempt current and former legislators, as Montana did in their Con-Con in 1972.

3. It is possible that a Con-Con push could suck air away from 2/3rds. My own view is we need to fight a multi-front war. A Con-Con would not present its recommendations to voters until 2011 or 2012. We could get a 2/3rds change on the November 2010 ballot.

4. This is by no means a Republican trick. The Courage Campaign has backed this ever since 90%+ of our members said “yes” to the idea in September. The Bay Area Council are a group of moderates, are by no means anti-government wackos, and understand and embrace the goals of empowerment. We have other progressive groups like Common Cause on board and we’re working in building a bigger coalition. Sure, the Republicans and the C of C will want to game it. But that’s why we go to the people. That’s why we empower the people through a Convention.

I cannot imagine that a convention comprised of the people would embrace Republican solutions. Those solutions are deeply unpopular. Even if the convention did propose that, we can kill it when it goes before voters for ratification (they would ratify the package as an up-or-down vote).

5. The status quo is a failure. We cannot continue like this – and in fact, we will not continue like this. We have had a slow-motion Constitutional Convention since 1978, driven mostly by the right. Arnold’s proposals have all be amendments to the Constitution. Some of these have already passed – like Prop 11. Others will pass, like the open primary. If we don’t get out in front via a Convention of the people, progressives will fall behind and the Constitution will change through other means into something more conservative.

We need to contact our Democratic State Senators and Assembly members let them know that we have their back. That we want them to fight and not cut. That we want a repeal of the 2/3 rules. That it is okay to behave like the majority party.

Here is a list of Democratic State Senators and Assembly members in our area. Unfortunately here in Ojai we are represented by Republicans, Tony Strickland in the 19th District in the Senate and his wife Audra Strickland in the 37th Assembly District. I’ll include their information, though they will not listen to us:

ASSEMBLY

37th – N Ventura County and NW LA County – Strickland, Audra (916) 319-2037 – Room 4208 – email

35th – SB County -Nava, Pedro (916) 319-2035 – Room 2148 – email

40th – W LA County – Blumenfield, Bob (916) 319-2040 – Room 6011 – email

41st – S Ventura County and W LA County- Brownley, Julia (916) 319-2041 – Room 2163 – email

42nd – LA County – Feuer, Mike (916) 319-2042 – Room 3146 – Assemblymember.Feuer@assembly.ca.gov

44th – LA County- Portantino, Anthony J. (916) 319-2044 – Room 2003 – Assemblymember.Portantino@assembly.ca.gov

53rd – SW LA County – Lieu, Ted W. (916) 319-2053 – Room 3173 – Assemblymember.Lieu@assembly.ca.gov

57th – E LA County – Hernandez, Edward P. (916) 319-2057 – Room 4112 – Assemblymember.Hernandez@assembly.ca.gov

SENATE

19th – SB County and Central Ventura County – Strickland, Tony – email
Thousand Oaks Sacramento Santa Barbara
(805) 494-8808 (805) 965-0862 (916) 651-4019

16th – Kern County – Florez, Deanemail
Fresno                  Sacramento         Bakersfield
(559) 264-3070 (916) 651-4016 (661) 395-2620

20th – E. Ventura County and W. LA – Padilla, Alexemail
Van Nuys              Sacramento
(818) 901-5588 (916) 651-4020

21st – LA – Liu, Carolemail
Glendale               Sacramento
(626) 683-0282 (916) 651-4021

23rd – W LA – Pavley, Franemail
Santa Monica        Sacramento
310-314-5214 (916) 651-4023

24th – SE LA – Romero, Gloria – senator.romero@sen.ca.gov
Los Angeles           Sacramento       Baldwin Park
(323) 881-0100 (916) 651-4024 (626) 337-2760

25th – S LA – Wright, Rodemail
Inglewood              Sacramento       Long Beach
(310) 412-0393 (916) 651-4025 (562) 427-1028

27th – S LA – Lowenthal, Alan – senator.lowenthal@sen.ca.gov
Long Beach            Sacramento         Paramount
(562) 495-4766 (916) 651-4027 (562) 529-6659

28th – S LA – Oropeza, Jennyemail
Redondo Beach        Sacramento
(310) 318-6994 (916) 651-4028

Call or email these folks and let them know that you support them and that you want to see them fight against the undemocratic 2/3 rules and place the blame where it belongs, on the minority party.

To my mind, getting a functional California out of this is the ultimate goal. We are the richest economy within the richest country on Earth. There are so many things we could do here in our state that would help everyone. Just take our vehicle fuel efficiency and reduced greenhouse gas emissions efforts for instance. We have the highest standards in the country and in most of the world. Tuesday, President Obama made California’s standards the new national standards. That’s a far cry from the dark days of the Bush Administration when we were told that we couldn’t set our own standards. Of course it was kind of funny that Schwarzenegger was invited by Obama to the announcement in DC just as the Governator was being severely beaten here at home.

Just Go to Your Room and Don’t Come Out

Friday, March 27th, 2009

The nation watched in amusement this week as Republicans laid out their plans promised an April Fool’s Day Budget complete with incomprehensible Kindergarten garbage they call charts. Some of us laughed. I hope that some of us cried; certainly, were I a conservative Republican, tears would be my reaction at the ineptitude of my so-called “leadership”.

But if you were like me, the presentation of such pre-adolescent tomfoolery was deeply offensive in a way that seemed to elude immediate articulation. Offensive in such a way that even outright mockery seemed insufficient in response.

After a day’s contemplation, I think I understand. The offense lies in the juvenility of the response; the utter rejection of seriousness as even a pretended modus operandi for one of our two great political parties; the seeming abdication of any real responsibility for actual participation in the purported governance of our great nation.

But more even than that, it lies in the brazenness of the GOP’s assumption that anyone with a sensible eye toward policy outcomes is even interested in their ideas or “solutions” at this point.

The GOP has been grounded. They trashed the American house, flooded the basement, broke nearly every piece of furniture we own, went on a spending spree with the parents’ credit card pretty much forcing us into bankruptcy while handing out party favors to their friends , and should by all rights be locked up in Juvie for assorted crimes petty and great.

And the American People said Enough. You’re grounded. Go to your room and don’t come out until you think about what you’ve done. Oh, and while you’re at it you can start by cleaning your room.

Because these proud ignoramuses can’t even get their own act together. Their own leader pwns himself on national television again and again, then says it was all part of some secret diabolical plan on his own part. The Republican Idol is a drug-addicted legend-in-his-own-mind radio star with an approval rating lower than dirt. Someone should seriously ask the GOP whether, if all their friends went out and jumped off a cliff, they would, too. Heck, these are people so emotionally stunted they’ve got posters of Chuck Freaking Norris hanging over their beds and Ayn Rand drivel on their bookshelves to make them feel tougher than their real emo, weepy, tantrum-throwing selves. The rest of us grew out of that phase when we turned 14. They can’t even manage to clean up their own backyard. And don’t even get me started on your girlfriend Sarah. The only person who sees starbursts when they look at her is you. It’s just…pathetic.

And these punks think anyone wants to hear anything they have to say? Why? As any responsible parent knows, respect is earned. And these two-bit jokers haven’t earned a shred of it. I mean, seriously now…Joe the Plumber? Dungeons and Dragons nerds live in a fantasy world more realistic than that.

The sheer notion that these delinquent ne’er-do-wells would interrupt adults attempting to fix the messes they created to take a gander at their cartoon drawings isn’t risible. It’s infuriating.

Just…go to your room, GOP. Don’t come out until you’ve had a chance to put on that dunce cap that suits you so well, think about all the damage you’ve done, and atone for it. You might want to try cleaning yourself up a bit and straightening your own room while you’re at it.

Just Go to Your Room and Don't Come Out

Friday, March 27th, 2009

The nation watched in amusement this week as Republicans laid out their plans promised an April Fool’s Day Budget complete with incomprehensible Kindergarten garbage they call charts. Some of us laughed. I hope that some of us cried; certainly, were I a conservative Republican, tears would be my reaction at the ineptitude of my so-called “leadership”.

But if you were like me, the presentation of such pre-adolescent tomfoolery was deeply offensive in a way that seemed to elude immediate articulation. Offensive in such a way that even outright mockery seemed insufficient in response.

After a day’s contemplation, I think I understand. The offense lies in the juvenility of the response; the utter rejection of seriousness as even a pretended modus operandi for one of our two great political parties; the seeming abdication of any real responsibility for actual participation in the purported governance of our great nation.

But more even than that, it lies in the brazenness of the GOP’s assumption that anyone with a sensible eye toward policy outcomes is even interested in their ideas or “solutions” at this point.

The GOP has been grounded. They trashed the American house, flooded the basement, broke nearly every piece of furniture we own, went on a spending spree with the parents’ credit card pretty much forcing us into bankruptcy while handing out party favors to their friends , and should by all rights be locked up in Juvie for assorted crimes petty and great.

And the American People said Enough. You’re grounded. Go to your room and don’t come out until you think about what you’ve done. Oh, and while you’re at it you can start by cleaning your room.

Because these proud ignoramuses can’t even get their own act together. Their own leader pwns himself on national television again and again, then says it was all part of some secret diabolical plan on his own part. The Republican Idol is a drug-addicted legend-in-his-own-mind radio star with an approval rating lower than dirt. Someone should seriously ask the GOP whether, if all their friends went out and jumped off a cliff, they would, too. Heck, these are people so emotionally stunted they’ve got posters of Chuck Freaking Norris hanging over their beds and Ayn Rand drivel on their bookshelves to make them feel tougher than their real emo, weepy, tantrum-throwing selves. The rest of us grew out of that phase when we turned 14. They can’t even manage to clean up their own backyard. And don’t even get me started on your girlfriend Sarah. The only person who sees starbursts when they look at her is you. It’s just…pathetic.

And these punks think anyone wants to hear anything they have to say? Why? As any responsible parent knows, respect is earned. And these two-bit jokers haven’t earned a shred of it. I mean, seriously now…Joe the Plumber? Dungeons and Dragons nerds live in a fantasy world more realistic than that.

The sheer notion that these delinquent ne’er-do-wells would interrupt adults attempting to fix the messes they created to take a gander at their cartoon drawings isn’t risible. It’s infuriating.

Just…go to your room, GOP. Don’t come out until you’ve had a chance to put on that dunce cap that suits you so well, think about all the damage you’ve done, and atone for it. You might want to try cleaning yourself up a bit and straightening your own room while you’re at it.

California Flunks Budget 101

Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009

cross posted from Making Waves Blog, Ventura County Star, March 2, 2009

WHAT’S THE BEST REASON to not cut our state education funding? In the future we’ll need sharp minds to get us out of these budget messes.

I’ve been hunkered down for the past few days looking over documents and trying to make some sense of the budget package the governor just signed and how it will affect the bottom line of our schools. It’s a precarious hodgepodge of $8.4 billion in cuts offset by reforms and accounting tricks. And all of this hinges on a package of ballot measures up in May, some designed to reshuffle prior ballot measures.

This labyrinthine budget reduces Prop. 98 guaranteed school funding from now through 2010 and then adds in another ballot measure to help to help restore the lost funds in 2011. Yet another tinkers with Prop. 98 formulas because the state now needs to borrow from future lottery earnings that would’ve gone to our schools.

Several of the seven ballot measures coming up on May 19 are so complicated that one could safely predict most voters probably won’t do anything but vote no in protest, if they bother to cast a ballot at all.

AND THERE’S MORE: Categorical funding for many important programs is being slashed 20 percent between now and 2010. Included in this are programs for gifted students, college preparation, middle and high school counseling, deferred maintenance, technology, English language acquisition, summer school, ROP programs, and, of course, arts and music. In return, school districts are being given the “flexibility” to move these pots of funding around, but it’s sort of like figuring out which child doesn’t get dinner that night.

Upcoming federal money, which would help reduce state taxes, would have no effect on K-12 classroom funding this budget year, according to the California Department of Education. In the longer term, “these resources will have a minimal impact on reducing the size and magnitude of the state reductions in education funding,” according to the California Association of School Business Officials.

AS YOU CAN SURMISE, budgeting for the next school year is like playing pin the tail on the weasel. It’s a moving target which the dedicated folks who can actually figure this stuff out HAVE to wrestle with because the deadline for letting teachers know whether or not they will have jobs next year is March 13. Yet, they won’t have any answers until June. Maybe.

Here in Ventura, school officials are looking at a mighty big gap. “… It will not look like business as usual here,” said Superintendent Trudy Arriaga. “We should not be celebrating a state budget that is cutting $10 million out of a little budget like the Ventura Unified School District has.

“We should be outraged.”

Most people just pay attention to all this by how it affects them personally. If you have a child in the public schools in California, expect bigger class sizes, no new textbooks, fewer supplies and technology, less remedial help, reduced maintenance and less emphasis on programs such as arts, music and physical education. Some familiar faces in teaching, staff and administration will be gone.

“About the only thing schools won’t have less of is testing,” said Ventura Unified Educators Association President Steve Blum. “The more-and-more testing crowd made sure state testing will be untouched.

“All this together is not good. This generation’s shortsighted approach to preparing the next generation for the future is sad.”

RSS RSS Feed
Email Get new posts

SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline